Environmental Costs Paid by the Polluter or the Beneficiary? The Case of CERCLA and Superfund

doi 10.3386/w4418
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

National Bureau of Economic Research

Related search

CERCLA-linked Environmental Impact and Benefit Analysis: Evaluating Remedial Alternatives for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
DevelopmentMedicinePlanningEnvironmental ScienceGeography
2017English

Free or Paid: The Uses of Roses Citadel (Catalonia)

Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
DevelopmentManagementBusinessPlanningUrban StudiesConservationAccountingGeography
2019English

The Effectiveness Assessment of Environmental Taxes From the "Polluter Pays" Position in the Scandinavian Countries: The Methodology and Results of the Study

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika
2017English

A Guide to CERCLA Site Assessment. Environmental Guidance

1994English

A Survey of the Environmental Conservation Costs by Local Authorities in Kenya

International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)
2013English

The Rise and Fall of the Polluter-Pays Principle in Developing Countries

International Review of Law and Economics
LawFinanceEconomicsEconometrics
2012English

Socio-Environmental Impact Assessment and Conflict: The Costs of the Gulf War

Policy, Organisation and Society
1991English

The Future of Human-Artificial Intelligence Nexus and Its Environmental Costs

Futures
DevelopmentPolitical ScienceSociologyInternational ManagementBusiness
2020English

Desflurane – Balancing the Environmental Costs and Cognitive Benefits. A Reply

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy