Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Attorney–Client Communication in Public Defense: A Qualitative Examination

Criminal Justice Policy Review - United States
doi 10.1177/0887403419861672
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date

July 15, 2019

Authors
Janet MooreVicki L. Plano ClarkLori A. FooteJacinda K. Dariotis
Publisher

SAGE Publications


Related search

The Attorney-Client Privilege in Congressional Investigations

Columbia Law Review
Law
1988English

Team of Rivals? Toward a New Model of the Corporate Attorney/Client Relationship

Current legal problems
Law
2009English

Decisions About Coercion: The Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver Problem

SSRN Electronic Journal
2007English

The Limited Impact of Nix v. Whiteside on Attorney-Client Relations

University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Law
1988English

Constitutional Law: Attorney Successfully Invokes Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in Behalf of Client

Duke Law Journal
Law
1964English

Attorneys Before the Grand Jury: Assertion of the Attorney-Client Privilege to Protect a Client's Identity

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Law
1984English

Developing a Care Pathway for Advance Decisions and Powers of Attorney: Qualitative Study

British Journal of Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2009English

Storytelling in Destination Brand Communication: A Qualitative Analysis

Journal of Global Business Insights
2016English

Client Requirements for Real-Time Communication Services

1990English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy