Bias in Cervical Total Disc Replacement Trials

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine - United States
doi 10.1007/s12178-017-9399-2
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Total Lumbar Disc Replacement

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
2005English

Clinical and Radiological Outcome at 10 Years of Follow-Up After Total Cervical Disc Replacement

European Spine Journal
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports Medicine
2017English

Osteopenia and Total Disc Prosthesis Subsidence: Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria for Total Disc Replacement

SAS Journal
2007English

Cervical Disc Replacement Surgery: Indications, Technique, and Technical Pearls

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
OrthopedicsSports Medicine
2017English

Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Total Disc Replacement at 7 Years—Prevalence, Progression, Clinical Implications, and Risk Factors

International Journal of Spine Surgery
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports Medicine
2018English

Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Predictors for Long-Term Outcome

European Spine Journal
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports Medicine
2017English

We Need to Talk About Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

International Journal of Spine Surgery
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports Medicine
2018English

Caution Required With Total Disc Replacement for Chronic Back Pain

British Journal of General Practice
MedicineFamily Practice
2013English

Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-Level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-Year Follow-Up

International Journal of Spine Surgery
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports Medicine
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy