Expert-Lay Interaction in Jury Trials (Case Study of Closing Arguments)

Journal of Language and Cultural Education
doi 10.1515/jolace-2017-0029
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Related search

The Jury as Critic: An Empirical Look at How Capital Juries Perceive Expert and Lay Testimony

Virginia Law Review
Law
1997English

Misconceptions of Insanity in Jury Trials

California Law Review
Law
1922English

Closing the Gap Between ‘Expert’ and ‘Lay’ Knowledge in the Governance of Wastewater: Lessons and Reflections From New Delhi

IDS Bulletin
DevelopmentPlanningGeography
2012English

The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials

SSRN Electronic Journal
2011English

The Transformations of Disease in Expert and Lay Medical Cultures

Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine
Drug DiscoveryAlternative MedicineComplementary
2011English

Objective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials

New Criminal Law Review
Law
2014English

Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks

Risk Analysis
QualityReliabilitySafetyRiskPhysiology
1992English

A Pragmatic Paradox Inherent in Expert Reports Addressed to Lay Citizens

2012English

Lay-Offs Follow Suspension of Clinical Trials of Protein

Nature
Multidisciplinary
1994English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy