(PDF) Figure 3: Proportion of Individual Killer Shrimp

Figure 3: Proportion of Individual Killer Shrimp (Binomial 95 CI) Settling in Zebra Mussel Beds of Different Sizes in Six Binary Choice Tests (A–F, N = 16 Shrimp/Test) Involving Different Amount of Zebra Mussel Cover (0, 33, 66, and 100% Tank Cover).

doi 10.7717/peerj.8075/fig-3

Full Text

Open PDF

Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 4: Proportion of Killer Shrimp (Binomial 95 CI) Settling in Binary Choice Tests Involving Different Substrates (Live Zebra Mussel, Empty Shells of Zebra Mussel, Artificial Grass) Tested Singly (A–B, N = 30 Shrimp/Test) or in Groups of 20 (C–D, N = 4 Tests).

English

Experimental Evidence of Chemical Attraction in the Mutualistic Zebra Mussel-Killer Shrimp System

English

Figure 6: Activity (Mean Number of Transitions ± 95 CI) of Individual Killer Shrimp Tested in Water Conditioned With Different Scents (Blank Water, N = 40; Tilapia Scent, N = 40; Zebra Mussel Scent, N = 40) From Sympatric (A; N = 60) and Allopatric (B; N = 60) Populations.

English

Figure 5: Preference by Individual Killer Shrimp (Mean Time Spent, S ± 95 CI) in Water Conditioned With Different Scents (Blank Water, N = 40; Tilapia Scent, N = 40; Zebra Mussel Scent, N = 40) From Sympatric (A, C, E; N = 60) and Allopatric (B, D, F; N = 60) Populations.

English

Figure 1: Location of Experimental Killer Shrimp Populations Living in Sympatry (Cardiff Bay) and Allopatry (Upper Mother Ditch) With Zebra Mussel.

English

First Zebra Mussel Record in Sarimehmet Dam and Possible Effects of Zebra Mussel Population on Regional Fisheries

Commagene Journal of Biology

2019

English

Impact of Oxygen Concentration on Zebra Mussel Mortality

2003

English

Figure 2: Experimental Set Up Used to Test Substrate Preferences of Killer Shrimp (A, Side View; C, Top View) and Chemical Attraction to Water Scented by Zebra Mussel (B, Side View; D, Top View).

English

Zebra Mussel Densities in St. Paul District, 1991-1994.

1995

English

Amanote Research

Figure 3: Proportion of Individual Killer Shrimp (Binomial 95 CI) Settling in Zebra Mussel Beds of Different Sizes in Six Binary Choice Tests (A–F, N = 16 Shrimp/Test) Involving Different Amount of Zebra Mussel Cover (0, 33, 66, and 100% Tank Cover).

doi 10.7717/peerj.8075/fig-3

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

Figure 4: Proportion of Killer Shrimp (Binomial 95 CI) Settling in Binary Choice Tests Involving Different Substrates (Live Zebra Mussel, Empty Shells of Zebra Mussel, Artificial Grass) Tested Singly (A–B, N = 30 Shrimp/Test) or in Groups of 20 (C–D, N = 4 Tests).

Experimental Evidence of Chemical Attraction in the Mutualistic Zebra Mussel-Killer Shrimp System

Figure 6: Activity (Mean Number of Transitions ± 95 CI) of Individual Killer Shrimp Tested in Water Conditioned With Different Scents (Blank Water, N = 40; Tilapia Scent, N = 40; Zebra Mussel Scent, N = 40) From Sympatric (A; N = 60) and Allopatric (B; N = 60) Populations.

Figure 5: Preference by Individual Killer Shrimp (Mean Time Spent, S ± 95 CI) in Water Conditioned With Different Scents (Blank Water, N = 40; Tilapia Scent, N = 40; Zebra Mussel Scent, N = 40) From Sympatric (A, C, E; N = 60) and Allopatric (B, D, F; N = 60) Populations.

Figure 1: Location of Experimental Killer Shrimp Populations Living in Sympatry (Cardiff Bay) and Allopatry (Upper Mother Ditch) With Zebra Mussel.

First Zebra Mussel Record in Sarimehmet Dam and Possible Effects of Zebra Mussel Population on Regional Fisheries

Impact of Oxygen Concentration on Zebra Mussel Mortality

Figure 2: Experimental Set Up Used to Test Substrate Preferences of Killer Shrimp (A, Side View; C, Top View) and Chemical Attraction to Water Scented by Zebra Mussel (B, Side View; D, Top View).

Zebra Mussel Densities in St. Paul District, 1991-1994.