Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 2: Values of Body Mass (Mb), Wing Span (B), Lift Surface (SL), Aspect Ratio (AR), and Wing Loading (WL) Estimated for Six Bohaiornithid Specimens Using Multiple Regressions Derived on Modern Flying Birds (See Methods).

doi 10.7717/peerj.7846/table-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

A CFD Study on Leading Edge Wing Surface Modification of a Low Aspect Ratio Flying Wing to Improve Lift Performance

International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles
Aerospace Engineering
2015English

Table 3: OLS Single Regressions Analyzing the Relationship Between Body Mass (Mb) and Wingspan (B) in Two Different Pools of Modern Birds.

English

Span Morphing Using the GNATSpar Wing

Aerospace Science and Technology
Aerospace Engineering
2016English

Unconventional High Aspect Ratio Joined-Wing Aircraft With Aft- And Forward-Swept Wing-Tips

2003English

Computational Study of a Battle Damaged Finite Aspect Ratio Wing

2012English

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wing and Wing-Body Configurations Using Control Theory

1995English

Active Flow Separation Control on a High-Lift Wing-Body Configuration Part 2: The Pulsed Blowing Application

2011English

Flexible High Aspect Ratio Wing: Low Cost Experimental Model and Computational Framework

2018English

High Aspect Ratio Wing Design: Optimal Aerostructural Tradeoffs for the Next Generation of Materials

2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy