Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 6: Discrimination Power of Each of the Three Models Tested in This Study by Ethnicity.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8232/table-6
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 2: The Models Tested for GEPd Estimation in the Present Study.
Table 2: Density Surface Models Tested.
Supplemental Information 6: Detailed Information About Each of the Pollinator Taxa Observed in This Study.
Table 1: Qmean Scores Obtained by the 797 Theoretical Models of nsLTPs of This Study.
Table 6: Model-Averaged Parameter Estimates Included in the Most Parsimonious Models (Models Within 2 Units of the ΔAICc) for Each Pathogen.
Table 6: Physical Properties of Cupcakes After Baking for the Formulations Tested.
Table 4: NFMI Values for Each of the Methods Tested and for All 12 Scenes.
Table 1: Results of Partial-Effect Analyses of the Deviance for Different Models Designed to Address the Three Objectives of This Study.
Table 6: Random Forest Outputs Distribution Across Each Phase.
