A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses That Evaluate Risk Factors for Dementia to Evaluate the Quantity, Quality, and Global Representativeness of Evidence

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease - Netherlands
doi 10.3233/jad-190181
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

IOS Press

Related search

A Comprehensive Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Nonpharmacological Interventions for Informal Dementia Caregivers

BMC Geriatrics
GerontologyGeriatrics
2020English

Barriers to the Uptake of Evidence From Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review of Decision Makers’ Perceptions

BMJ Open
Medicine
2012English

Risk Factors for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Annals of Oncology
MedicineOncologyHematology
2016English

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

New Visualization Method to Evaluate Erosion Quantity and Pattern

Geotechnical Testing Journal
Geotechnical EngineeringEngineering Geology
2016English

257 Risk Factors for Infantile Hemangioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Investigative Dermatology
BiochemistryDermatologyCell BiologyMolecular Biology
2019English

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Moderate to Severe Dementia

Psychiatry Investigation
PsychiatryMental HealthBiological Psychiatry
2019English

Defining and Systematic Analyses of Aggregation Indices to Evaluate Degree of Calcium Oxalate Crystal Aggregation

Frontiers in Chemistry
Chemistry
2017English

Quantity and Quality of Sleep and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diabetes Care
Internal MedicineEndocrinologyAdvancedMetabolismSpecialized NursingDiabetes
2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy