Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 3: Test–retest Reliability of the Experience During Labor, on Percentage Women With a Negative Experience and Mean Score (N= 208).

doi 10.7717/peerj.2092/table-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table S1: One-Month Test-Retest Reliability for PRAS Subscale Scores (N = 175)

English

Table 3: IRV-KT Test Reliability (N = 45).

English

Table 3: Reliable Change of Test-Retest for Each Breathalyser.

English

Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Early Trauma Inventory in Spanish Postpartum Women

Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
PsychiatryMental Health
2011English

Test-Retest Correlations and the Reliability of Copy Testing

Journal of Marketing Research
MarketingEconomicsInternational ManagementBusinessEconometrics
1977English

ImPact Test-Retest Reliability: Reliably Unreliable?

Journal of Athletic Training
Sports MedicinePhysical TherapySports ScienceSports TherapyOrthopedicsMedicineRehabilitation
2013English

Test–retest Reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire

Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health and Behavior
MedicineEnvironmentalPublic HealthBehavioral NeuroscienceOccupational Health
2015English

Test-Retest Reliability of Knee Kinematics Measurement During Gait With 3D Motion Analysis System

Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences
2018English

The Test-Retest Reliability of Free Association Norms

Psychonomic Science
1967English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy