Hughes v. Oklahoma: The Court, the Commerce Clause, and State Control of Natural Resources

Supreme Court Review - United States
doi 10.1086/scr.1979.3109566
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date
Authors
Publisher

University of Chicago Press

Related search

Twenty‐One Months of Hell and the Supreme Court to the Rescue in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents

Journal of Supreme Court History
2020English

The Internet and the Dormant Commerce Clause

SSRN Electronic Journal
2000English

The Negative Implications of the Commerce Clause

University of Chicago Law Review
Law
1936English

The Scope of the Commerce Clause After Morrison

SSRN Electronic Journal
2001English

State Court Defiance and the Limits of Supreme Court Authority: Williams v. Georgia Revisited

Yale Law Journal
Law
1994English

Lobbying the Supreme Court: Reagan’s Solicitor General and the Establishment Clause

American Review of Politics
1991English

Untangling the Market-Participant Exemption to the Dormant Commerce Clause

Michigan Law Review
Law
1989English

Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause

SSRN Electronic Journal
2010English

Congressional Control of Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: Why the Original Jurisdiction Clause Suggests an "Essential Role"

Yale Law Journal
Law
1991English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy