Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Approaches for Major or Challenging Hepatectomy

Journal of the American College of Surgeons - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.051
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Surgery
Date

May 1, 2017

Authors
Lucas W. ThornbladeXu ShiAlex RuizDavid R. FlumJames O. Park
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer ResearchMedicineOncology
2016English

Lumbar Fracture : Is It Better to Operate With Minimally Invasive Surgery or Conventional (Open) Surgery?

Surgery & Case Studies: Open Access Journal
2019English

Minimally Invasive Living Donor Hepatectomy

Current Transplantation Reports
2013English

Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy Reduces Major Morbidity and Hospital Resource Utilization in the Elderly

HPB
HepatologyGastroenterology
2019English

Minimally Invasive Surgery

Endoscopy
Gastroenterology
2004English

Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
MedicineAnesthesiologyPain Medicine
1999English

Comparative Effectiveness of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

Spine Journal
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports MedicineNeurology
2014English

Minimally Invasive Approaches: Cryoablation

Breast Cancer Online
2005English

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
2001English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy