Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Reviewing Scientific Manuscripts: A Comprehensive Guide for Peer Reviewers

Annals of Thoracic Surgery - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.015
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Respiratory MedicinePulmonaryCardiovascular MedicineSurgeryCardiology
Date

May 1, 2017

Authors
Lisa M. BrownElizabeth A. DavidTara KaramlouKatie S. Nason
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

A Beginner's Guide to Reviewing Manuscripts in Ecology and Conservation

Ideas in Ecology and Evolution
2011English

Reviewing Scientific Manuscripts: How Much Statistical Knowledge Should a Reviewer Really Know?

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
MedicinePhysiology
2009English

How to Assess a Survey Report: A Guide for Readers and Peer Reviewers

CMAJ
Medicine
2015English

A Call for Reviewers and Guidelines for Reviewing

Journal of Wildlife Management
EvolutionEcologyNatureSystematicsBehaviorLandscape Conservation
2019English

Reviewers of Manuscripts

Ecology
EvolutionEcologySystematicsBehavior
2019English

Reviewers of Manuscripts

Ecology
EvolutionEcologySystematicsBehavior
2018English

Reviewers of Manuscripts

Ecology
EvolutionEcologySystematicsBehavior
2016English

Reviewing Peer Review

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2008English

Preparing a Manuscripts Guide for a Learned Society

American Archivist
ArtsInformation SciencesLibraryHumanities
1962English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy