Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

The Peer Review Process II: To Review and Be Reviewed

International Urogynecology Journal - United Kingdom
doi 10.1007/s00192-011-1560-7
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
Date

September 8, 2011

Authors
Paul Riss
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC


Related search

Teaching the Peer-Reviewed Publishing Process

Journal of Food Science
Food Science
2019English

Empowerment in Tourism: A Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature

Tourism Review International
TourismHospitality ManagementLeisure
2017English

The Value and Process of Peer Review

AORN Journal
Surgical NursingMedical
2018English

Peer Review Process File 20150101

Journal of Clinical and Translational Research
2015English

The Peer Reviewed Technical Literature and the Litigation Process

Environmental Forensics
ManagementMonitoringWaste ManagementDisposalPolicyLaw
2018English

Peer Review of Peer Review?

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
1990English

Peer Reviewed Safety Management System (SMS): Collaboration for Continuous Improvement (Literature Review)

International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace
RiskCivilStructural EngineeringReliabilitySafetyQualityAerospace Engineering
2016English

An Innovative Faculty Development Process: Peer Review

Journal of Nursing & Healthcare
2017English

US Legal Principles and Confidentiality of the Peer Review Process

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
2002English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy