Epistocracy for Online Deliberative Bioethics

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics - United Kingdom
doi 10.1017/s0963180114000590
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Related search

Assessing the Public's Views in Research Ethics Controversies: Deliberative Democracy and Bioethics as Natural Allies

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
MedicineCommunicationLawEducationSocial Psychology
2009English

Deliberative Research for Deliberative Policy Making: Creating and Recreating Evidence in Transport Policy

Social Policy and Society
SociologyInternational RelationsPolitical Science
2011English

Designing Auctions for Deliberative Agents

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2006English

Bioethics.

Practica Otologica
Otorhinolaryngology
1995English

Travelling Bioethics

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Health PolicyEducationHealth
2010English

Go! For Multi-Threaded Deliberative Agents

2003English

Questioning Discourse Quality Online or How to Deal With the Deliberative Character of Contemporary (Social) Communication?

Media Transformations
2012English

The “Deliberative Bureaucrat”: Deliberative Democracy and Institutional Trust in the Jurisdiction of the Finnish Planner

Planning Theory and Practice
DevelopmentPlanningGeography
2016English

Bioethics: Why Philosophy Is Essential for Progress

Journal of Medical Ethics
ArtsHumanitiesLegal AspectsHealth PolicyHealthEthicsIssues
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy