Tracking a Therapeutic Response: How Reliable Are Serial Measurements of LV Perfusion and Function?

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology - United States
doi 10.1007/s12350-012-9518-9
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Are Measurements of Sacral Slopes Reliable?

American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
2014English

How Reliable Are Scientific Studies?

British Journal of Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2010English

How Reliable Are Human Phylogenetic Hypotheses?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2000English

Evaluating LV Function in Mouse Myocardial Infarction Model by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
UltrasonicsRadiologyUltrasound TechnologyAcousticsNuclear MedicineBiophysicsRadiologicalImaging
2017English

How Reliable Are Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Quality? A Variance Components Approach

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Education
2016English

How Reliable Are G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Antibodies?

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
MedicinePharmacology
2009English

Repeatability of Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony and Function Parameters in Serial Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Studies

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyCardiovascular MedicineImagingCardiology
2010English

How Reliable Are Laboratory Test When Diagnosing Bitch Mastitis?

2020English

How Reliable Are Efficiency Measurements of Perovskite Solar Cells? The First Inter-Comparison, Between Two Accredited and Eight Non-Accredited Laboratories

Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Materials ScienceChemistrythe EnvironmentSustainabilityRenewable Energy
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy