Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 4: All Significant Differences (P-Values) Between the Studied Sites for the Abundance of the Zooplankton Groups (Post-Hoc Multiple Comparisons of Mean Ranks for All Groups).
doi 10.7717/peerj.5087/table-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 3: All Significant Differences (P-Values) Between the Studied Sites for the Richness of the Zooplankton Groups (Post-Hoc Multiple Comparisons of Mean Ranks for All Groups).
Figure 8: Percentage Contribution of Zooplankton Groups in the Mean Total Abundance of Zooplankton at the Sites Examined in the Barycz River.
Table S1: Results of Pairwise Comparisons for All Studied Groups of Samples in Alpha-Diversity Measures (Mann–Whitney Pairwise Test)
Table 1: Mean Values (Mean ± SE) and Significance Tests of Soil Properties Across All Sites.
Table 6: Spearman’s Significant Correlations Between Abundance and the Values of Environmental Factors (P < 0.05).
Table 4: NFMI Values for Each of the Methods Tested and for All 12 Scenes.
Table 4: Neutrality Tests for the Three Groups.
Figure S3: The Abundance of 4 Microbial Genera That Showed Significant Abundance Differences Between Species
Table S2: Differentially Expressed Proteins in All Treatment Groups
