Listening Ability by Differences of the Speech Processing Method of 22 Channels Cochlear Implant Equipment ; MPEAK Method vs.SPEAK Method.

AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
doi 10.4295/audiology.37.635
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Japan Audiological Society

Related search

Speech Processing Method and Language Listening Ability.

AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
1997English

Effect of Spectral Channels on Speech Recognition, Comprehension, and Listening Effort in Cochlear-Implant Users

Trends in hearing
OtorhinolaryngologySpeechHearing
2020English

Adjustment of Cochlear Implant Speech Processing Program

Practica Otologica, Supplement
Otorhinolaryngology
2006English

Improving Speech Recognition in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users by Listening With the Better Ear

Trends in hearing
OtorhinolaryngologySpeechHearing
2018English

On Telephone Listening Ability in Cochlear Implant Wearing Person. The First Report.

AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
1998English

The Influence of the Material and the Method of Processing on the Measurement Ability to Surface Texture by Coherence Correlation Interferometry Method

Mechanik
2016English

Advanced Beamformers for Cochlear Implant Users: Acute Measurement of Speech Perception in Challenging Listening Conditions

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Disinfection of Anaesthesia Equipment by a Mechanized Pasteurization Method

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
MedicineAnesthesiologyPain Medicine
1975English

Evoked Cortical Activity and Speech Recognition as a Function of the Number of Simulated Cochlear Implant Channels

Clinical Neurophysiology
Sensory SystemsNeurologyPhysiology
2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy