What Still Remains Missing From Participants’ Selection Criteria in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews?

Journal of the American Dental Association - United States
doi 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.08.027
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Evaluation of Selection Criteria Used in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
MedicineNeurology
1998English

Statins in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Evidence From Systematic Reviews and Randomized Clinical Trials

PLoS Medicine
BiochemistryBiotechnologyMolecular BiologyCell BiologyMedicine
2006English

Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgery: Are We Still Missing Something Important?

International Urogynecology Journal
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
2012English

Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials

BJS open
Surgery
2020English

Recreating Self From What Remains

The Lancet Neurology
Neurology
2016English

Improving Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Why Eligible Participants Decline

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
MedicineCommunicationLawEducationSocial Psychology
2011English

Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials of Interventions for Painful Shoulder: Selection Criteria, Outcome Assessment, and Efficacy

BMJ
1998English

Clinical Trials Registries Are Under-Utilized in the Conduct of Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2014English

Design and Estimation in Clinical Trials With Subpopulation Selection

Statistics in Medicine
EpidemiologyStatisticsProbability
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy