Legislative Responses to Wrongful Conviction: Do Partisan Principals and Advocacy Efforts Influence State-Level Criminal Justice Policy?

Social Science Research - United States
doi 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.004
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

A Derivation of Probabilities of Correct and Wrongful Conviction in a Criminal Trial

SSRN Electronic Journal
2006English

The Ifluence of Victims' Advocacy on Criminal Justice Policy : The Case of CAVEAT

English

Evaluating Human Rights Advocacy on Criminal Justice and Sex Work

Health and Human Rights
International RelationsSociologyHealthPolitical Science
2015English

Investigation to Exoneration: A Systemic Review of Wrongful Conviction in Australia

Current Issues in Criminal Justice
2016English

The Different Outcomes of Legislative- Versus Advocacy-Led Development of Cannabis Policy

Addiction
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2018English

Right to Counsel in Criminal Post-Conviction Review Proceedings

California Law Review
Law
1963English

Principals of Audit: Testing, Data and ‘Implicated Advocacy’

Journal of educational administration and history
EducationSociologyPolitical Science
2015English

Russian Criminal Policy: Origin and Present-Day State

HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW
2017English

Impact and the Reflexive Imperative in Criminal Justice Policy, Practice and Research

2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy