Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 3: Mean Peak Force Outputs for Both Feedback Groups During the Two Testing Sessions (T1 and T2).
doi 10.7717/peerj.4972/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Average Between Limb Asymmetry for Both FB Groups During the Two Testing Sessions (Test 1 and Test 2).
Joint Myocardial T1 and T2 Mapping
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Ultrasound Technology
Cardiology
Family Practice
Radiological
Cardiovascular Medicine
Imaging
Measuring T2 and T1, and Imaging T2 Without Spin Echoes
Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Biochemistry
Nuclear
High Energy Physics
Condensed Matter Physics
Biophysics
Table 3: Mean (SD) for Mean and Peak RER Results for Sets, Rest Periods, and Averages.
Figure 1: Ultrasound Transducer Interface Housing for the Load Cell Used During Force-Feedback Scanning.
Myocardial T1 and T2 Mappings With Automatic Motion Correction at 3 Tesla MR: Comparison of T1 and T2 Measurements by Breathhold, Free-Breathing and Cardiac Cycle
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Ultrasound Technology
Cardiology
Family Practice
Radiological
Cardiovascular Medicine
Imaging
Figure 2: The Mean Point Estimation Error Within Groups.
Examining the Identification of Age-Related Atrophy Between T1 and T1 + T2-Flair Cortical Thickness Measurements
Scientific Reports
Multidisciplinary
Figure 3: Experimental Setup (Testing the Cleaning Station) at Both the Nursery (Control) and Transplantation (Treatment) Sites.
