Is the High Court Mistaken About the Aim of Statutory Interpretation?

Federal Law Review - Australia
doi 10.1177/0067205x1604400203
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date
Authors
Publisher

SAGE Publications

Related search

The Methods of Statutory Interpretation in the Practice of the High Courts of Hungary

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M – Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis
2017English

The Methods of Statutory Interpretation in the Practice of the High Courts of Hungary

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M, Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis
2017English

All About Words: Early Understandings of the "Judicial Power" in Statutory Interpretation, 1776-1806

Columbia Law Review
Law
2001English

The Warp and Woof of Statutory Interpretation: Comparing Supreme Court Approaches in Tax Law and Workplace Law

SSRN Electronic Journal
2009English

Which Kraft of Statutory Interpretation? A Supreme Court of Canada Trilogy on Intellectual Property Law

Alberta Law Review
2008English

Statutory Interpretation, Victimization Under Equality Law, and Its ‘On–Off’ Relationship With Contempt of Court

Statute Law Review
Law
2016English

Public Values in Statutory Interpretation

University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Law
1989English

Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State

Columbia Law Review
Law
1989English

Earthquakes and Tremors in Statutory Interpretation: An Empirical Study of the Dynamics of Interpretation

Issues in Legal Scholarship
Law
2002English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy