Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery - United Kingdom
doi 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.026
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
SurgeryCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
Date

April 1, 2019

Authors
Kevin ManiMartin Björck
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

Randomised Controlled Trials

Eye
MedicineArtsSensory SystemsOphthalmologyHumanities
1995English

Covariance Modelling for Randomised Controlled Trials

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2013English

Differential Dropout and Bias in Randomised Controlled Trials: When It Matters and When It May Not

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2013English

Response to ‘Randomised Controlled Trials Do Not Always Give the Results We Want but That Doesn’t Mean We Should Abandon Randomised Controlled Trials’

Spinal Cord
MedicineNeurologyRehabilitation
2015English

Long Live Lind: The History of the Randomised Controlled Trials

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2019English

Randomised Controlled Trials in General Practice

BMJ
1995English

Methodological Considerations for Neonatal Trials Involving Multiples: Lessons From the Bracelet Study (Bereavement and Randomised Controlled Trials)

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2013English

Reporting Attrition in Randomised Controlled Trials

BMJ
2006English

Where Next for Randomised Controlled Trials in Global Health?

The Lancet
Medicine
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy