Comparing the Theoretical Performances of 1.65- And 3.3-Μm Differential Absorption Lidar Systems Used for Airborne Remote Sensing of Natural Gas Leaks (Erratum)

Journal of Applied Remote Sensing - United States
doi 10.1117/1.jrs.12.029901
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng

Related search

Direct Detection Differential Absorption LIDAR for Multi-Species Atmospheric Sensing in the 2-Μm Range

2016English

Airborne, Optical Remote Sensing of Methane and Ethane for Natural Gas Pipline Leak Detection

2004English

A New Airborne Lidar for Remote Sensing of Canopy Fluorescence and Vertical Profile

EPJ Web of Conferences
AstronomyPhysics
2016English

Extended Performance Handheld and Mobile Sensors for Remote Detection of Natural Gas Leaks

2005English

The Remote Measurement of Column Integrated Carbon Dioxide Using Differential Optical Absorption Lidar

2015English

Methane Leaks From Natural Gas Systems Follow Extreme Distributions

English

Crown-Level Tree Species Classification Using Integrated Airborne Hyperspectral and Lidar Remote Sensing Data

ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
2018English

Airborne Lidar Remote Sensing Applications in Non-Forested Short Stature Environments: A Review

Annals of Forest Research
ForestryEcologyPlant Science
2017English

Validation of a G-Band Differential Absorption Cloud Radar for Humidity Remote Sensing

Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Ocean EngineeringAtmospheric Science
2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy