Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Estimating the Prevalence of Researcher Misconduct: A Study of UK Academics Within Biological Sciences

PeerJ - United States
doi 10.7717/peerj.562
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
GeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryBiological SciencesMedicineAgriculturalNeuroscience
Date

September 9, 2014

Authors
David L. RobertsFreya A.V. St. John
Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Bubble-Fusion Researcher Loses Misconduct Appeal

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2008English

The American Biological Sciences Curriculum Study

American Biology Teacher
AgriculturalEducationBiological Sciences
1964English

How to Minimize Research Misconduct? Priorities for Academics in Nursing

Journal of Advanced Nursing
Nursing
2019English

Examining the Doctoral Viva: Perspectives From a Sample of UK Academics

London Review of Education
Education
2015English

Spotlight on Sexual Misconduct at the Aquatic Sciences Meeting

Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin
OceanographyWater ScienceTechnologyAquatic Science
2017English

Dishonesty and Research Misconduct Within the Medical Profession

BMC Medical Ethics
Health PolicyEthicsHealthIssuesLegal Aspects
2020English

Biological Treatment of Landfill Leachate: Efford Landfill, Hampshire, UK - A Case Study

Linnaeus Eco-Tech
2019English

Conducting a Pilot Study: Case Study of a Novice Researcher

British Journal of Nursing
Nursing
2015English

International Union of Biological Sciences

Nature
Multidisciplinary
1947English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy