Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 5: Similarity of the Trees From Each Coding Treatment.
doi 10.7717/peerj.5901/table-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 5: Reliable Change Between Each Breathalyser.
Figure 5: Similarity of Trap Catches (Bray–-Curtis Similarity Coefficient) Against the Distance Between Each Trap Combinations.
Table 5: Analysis of Variance of Each Variable Analyzed Within Each Group of Varieties Studied.
Table 5: Maximum Similarities of Trees From Our Analyses Expressed as ITRIs (In %).
Table 5: Chavda Type Proportion of Hearing Improved Cases at Each Frequencies.
Table 2: Information of DEGs Screened From Each Dataset.
Supplemental Information 5: Mean Water Parameters for Each Treatment.
Table 6: PCR Validation of Sequences Coding for Pdp11-Specific Proteins Using the Primer Pairs of Table 2 for Pdp11-Sequences Coding Pdp11-Specific Proteins in Table 5.
Learning Distance Function by Coding Similarity
