Comparison of Automatic QT Measurement Techniques in the Normal 12 Lead Electrocardiogram

ACC Current Journal Review
doi 10.1016/1062-1458(96)82289-6
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors

Unknown

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

3 and 12 Lead Electrocardiogram Interpretation by Computer. A Comparison on 1093 Patients.

Heart
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
1971English

Validation of Automatic Measurement of QT Interval Variability

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Significance of the QX/QT Ratio and the QT Ratio (QTr) in the Exercise Electrocardiogram

Circulation
Cardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
1965English

Evaluation of Limited and Alternative Lead Sets for the Reconstruction of the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram and Body Surface Potential Maps

2007English

The Search for Non-Invasive Markers of Cardiac Diseases Comes Back to the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram

International Journal of Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2020English

Comparison of Automatic and Manual Measurement of Qt and QTC Intervals During a Clinical Phase Iii-B/ Iv in Kolle, Mali

BMJ Global Health
Health PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2017English

The Genesis of the Normal Electrocardiogram

Heart
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
1946English

Low Blood Lead (Pb) and Prolonged P Wave as Cardiotoxicity Indicator in 12-Lead Resting Electrocardiogram Among Malaysian Adult

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
2015English

Wave Amplitude Relationships in the Normal Electrocardiogram.

Heart
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
1968English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy