Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 6: Identification Success of the COI and 16S rDNA Barcoding Markers Based on the ‘Best Match’, ‘Best Close Match’ and ‘All Species Barcode’ Approaches.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8755/fig-6
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 1: Identification Success of Three Tri Genotypes Based on Tri12 Gene Using Species Identifier 1.7.7 Software Under ‘Best Match’ and ‘Best Close Match’ Methods.
Best Match Graphs
Journal of Mathematical Biology
Agricultural
Applied Mathematics
Simulation
Modeling
Biological Sciences
Table 2: Composition of Characters in the COI, 16S rDNA and COI + 16S rDNA Aligned Datasets.
Table 3: Genetic Distance of Pomacea Specimens Using COI, 16S rDNA and COI + 16S rDNA Aligned Datasets.
Identification of Best Indicators of Peptide-Spectrum Match Using a Permutation Resampling Approach
Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Biochemistry
Computer Science Applications
Molecular Biology
Light-Weight Ontology Alignment Using Best-Match Clone Detection
Figure 6: ASTRAL Tree Based on RAxML Best Trees of the Concatenated Matrix for All Orthologs With Four or More Species.
Table S4: Genetic Divergence Analysis of the COI + 16S rDNA Dataset Based on Pairwise Alignment of All 40 Pomacea Specimens
One-Match and All-Match Categories for Keywords Matching in Chatbot
American Journal of Applied Sciences
Multidisciplinary
