Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 4: Relative Contribution of Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Β-Diversity of (A) PFT1, (B) PFT2, (C) PFT3 and (D) PFT4 Based on Variation Partitioning.
doi 10.7717/peerj.6714/fig-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Decoupling Species Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Beta Diversity Across a Fragmented Landscape
PeerJ
Genetics
Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Biological Sciences
Medicine
Agricultural
Neuroscience
Figure 4: Spatial Autocorrelation of Troglobitic Species Composition, Species Richness, Rarity-Weighted Richness and Phylogenetic Diversity Across Different Spatial Scales.
Figure 3: Partitioning of Variation in Alpha- And Beta-Level Taxonomic (TD), Phylogenetic (PD), and Functional (FD) Diversity.
Figure 4: Shape Variation of Fasciola. Spp. Based on Landmark-Based Analyses.
Figure 4: Variation in the Relative Fatness of Brown Frogs of Different Ages (Mean ± SE).
Figure 3: Abiotic Drivers of Variation on Species Richness and Weighted Endemism Tested in This Study.
Figure 4: Relative Abundance of the Dominant Phyla (A) Firmicutes, (B) Ptoteobacteria, (C) Actinobacteria, (D) Fusobacteria) in Different Wintering Periods.
Figure 6: The Spatial Variation of Species and Species Quantity.
Figure 7: Variation Partitioning Analysis Showing the Percentages of Variance in Bacterial Communities Explained by Environment Factors and Spatial Variable (PCNM).
