Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 5: Summary Results of Cross-Validation for the Meuse (Zinc) and SIC 1997 (Rainfall) Data Sets (A) and Variogram Models for CV Residuals (B–C). Comparison of Accuracy Plots for the Meuse Data Set (D–E).
doi 10.7717/peerj.5518/fig-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Congo-Meuse N°1 (1997)
Études littéraires africaines
Figure 3: Schematic Examples of Standard Mapping Performance Criteria Used for Evaluation of Spatial Prediction Algorithms and Their Interpretation: (A) Predicted vs. Observed Plot, (B) Standardized Accuracy vs. Standard Deviation of the Z-Scores, (C) “Accuracy Plots” (After Goovaerts (1999)), and (D) Variogram of the Target Variable and the Cross-Validation Residuals.
A Validation Data-Set and Suggested Validation Protocol for Ship Evacuation Models
Fire Safety Science
Data and Model Cross-Validation to Improve Accuracy of Microsimulation Results: Estimates for the Polish Household Budget Survey
SSRN Electronic Journal
An Experimental Data Set for the Accuracy Assessment of Room Fire Models
Figure 6: Evaluation Results of All Methods in the (A) Linear, (B) Invertible and (C) Non-Invertible Data Sets.
Figure 3: Evaluation Results of All Methods in the SIM and SIM-c Data Sets.
Figure 4: Transformation of Time-Mass-Data and a Regression Line for the Transformed Data Set.
Figure 7: Comparison of Training and Validation Accuracy Between Parameters Using All Dataset and (A) KNN, (B) SVC, (C) LG, (D) MLP and (E) K-Means.
