Reducing Sentencing Disparity by Increasing Judicial Discretion

Federal Sentencing Reporter
doi 10.1525/fsr.2009.22.2.81
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

University of California Press

Related search

Post-Booker Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Trends in Criminal Intellectual Property Cases: Empirical Analysis and Societal Implications

SSRN Electronic Journal
2011English

Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions

American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
EconomicsEconometricsFinance
2019English

Judicial Discretion in Corporate Bankruptcy

Review of Financial Studies
AccountingEconomicsEconometricsFinance
2010English

Judicial Discretion in Patent Causes

Yale Law Journal
Law
1914English

Specifics of Implementation of Judicial Consideration Within Judicial Discretion

2019English

Judicial Appraisals of Risk Assessment in Sentencing

Behavioral Sciences and the Law
MedicineClinical PsychologyPsychiatryLawMental Health
2018English

Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Discretion, and Equitable Defenses

SSRN Electronic Journal
2016English

Reducing Errors by Increasing Legibility

Western Journal of Medicine
2000English

Abuse of Discretion: Administrative Expertise vs. Judicial Surveillance

University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Law
1966English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy