Choosing Peers, Improve the Quality of Peer Assessment

doi 10.2991/icmmita-16.2016.206
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Atlantis Press

Related search

Power of Peers: Experiences Using an Online Peer Assessment Tool to Grade Student Work

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
2018English

Hybrid Peer-To-Peer Streaming System for Mobile Peers With Transcoding

2015English

Children’s Sympathy for Peers Who Are the Targets of Peer Aggression

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
PsychiatryDevelopmentalMental HealthEducational Psychology
2012English

Choosing the Appropriate Peer-Reviewed Journal for Submission of Your Manuscript

Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyBiomedical EngineeringBiophysicsImagingAstronomyPhysics
2018English

Peer Assessment Without Assessment Criteria

Studies in Higher Education
Education
2013English

Exploring the Value of Peer Assessment

English

SHP: A Hierarchical Protocol to Improve Performance of Peer-To-Peer Systems

International Journal of Peer to Peer Networks
2012English

Confidential Reports May Improve Peer Review

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2004English

Quality-Control Assessment to Improve the Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging Perfusion

American Journal of Neuroradiology
MedicineNuclear MedicineNeurologyImagingRadiology
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy