Is a Cutoff of 10% Appropriate for the Change-In-Estimate Criterion of Confounder Identification?

Journal of Epidemiology - Japan
doi 10.2188/jea.je20130062
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Japan Epidemiological Association

Related search

The Evidence Based Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis, Which Is the Most Appropriate Estimate?

Journal of Allergy & Therapy
2016English

MET in Gastric Cancer - Discarding a 10% Cutoff Rule

Histopathology
MedicineForensic MedicinePathologyHistology
2015English

Preliminary Estimate of a Hearing Damage Risk Criterion for Steady State Noise

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1952English

Allergic Status Is a Confounder for Inpatient Length of Stay and Outcome Analysis

Radiology
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyImaging
2016English

Impact Factor: An Appropriate Criterion for the Qualis Journals Classification in the Pharmacy Area?

Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
ToxicologyPharmaceuticsPharmacology
2017English

Is Proton Pump Inhibitor Use a Significant Confounder for Chromogranin a Levels in Sepsis?

Intensive Care Medicine
Critical CareIntensive Care Medicine
2012English

Serum Uric Acid and Appropriate Cutoff Value for Prediction of Metabolic Syndrome Among Chinese Adults

Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
MedicineNutritionClinical BiochemistryDietetics
2013English

What Is the Appropriate Size Criterion for Proton Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Dosimetric Comparison of Spot-Scanning Proton Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Radiation Oncology
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyImagingOncology
2013English

Distortion as a Validation Criterion in the Identification of Suspicious Reviews

2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy