Costs and Benefits of Orthographic Inconsistency in Reading: Evidence From a Cross-Linguistic Comparison

PLoS ONE - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0157457
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

Chapter 10. Cross-Linguistic Evidence for Probabilistic Orthographic Cues to Lexical Stress

Trends in Language Acquisition Research
2016English

CLEARPOND: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2012English

Costs and Benefits of Dollarization: Evidence From North, Central, and South America

Journal of Economic Integration
EconomicsEconometricsFinance
2002English

The Time Course of Phonological, Semantic, and Orthographic Coding in Reading: Evidence From the Fast-Priming Technique

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
DevelopmentalArtsEducational PsychologyCognitive PsychologyHumanitiesExperimental
1999English

Reading and Spelling Development Across Languages Varying in Orthographic Consistency: Do Their Paths Cross?

Child Development
DevelopmentalChild HealthEducational PsychologyPerinatologySocial WorkPediatricsEducation
2019English

Evidence on the Costs and Benefits of Bond IPOs

2006English

Lamunkhin Even Evaluative Morphology in Cross-Linguistic Comparison

Morphology
LinguisticsLanguage
2016English

Semantic Parafoveal-On-Foveal Effects and Preview Benefits in Reading: Evidence From Fixation Related Potentials

Brain and Language
LinguisticsLanguageCognitive PsychologyCognitive NeuroscienceHearingSpeechExperimental
2016English

The Use of Orthographic Knowledge in Beginning Reading

Journal of Reading Behavior
1986English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy