A Comparative Study, by Simulation, of Bull and Cow Evaluation Methods

Genetics, Selection, Evolution - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1297-9686-14-1-114
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Evaluation of Subset Matching Methods: Evidence From a Monte Carlo Simulation Study

American Journal of Applied Sciences
Multidisciplinary
2019English

Problems in Cow Evaluation and Current Use of Cow Index Report of a Working Group on Cow Evaluation

Annales de Génétique et de Sélection Animale
1978English

A Comparative Study of Feature Selection Methods

International Journal on Natural Language Computing
2018English

If a Bull Were a Cow, How Much Milk Would He Give?

Annual Review of Animal Biosciences
Animal ScienceZoologyVeterinaryGeneticsBiotechnology
2015English

A Comparative Simulation Study of Annunciator Systems

1984English

Evaluation and Comparison of Statistical Methods for Early Temporal Detection of Outbreaks: A Simulation-Based Study

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Evaluation of Sudanese Phosphate Rocks by Two Rapid Methods for Determination of Total and Available Phosphorus: Comparative Study

Oriental Journal of Chemistry
BiochemistryEnvironmental ChemistryDrug DiscoveryChemistry
2016English

Energy Efficiency of Different Emulsification Methods: A Comparative Evaluation

Japan Journal of Food Engineering
IndustrialManufacturing EngineeringFood Science
2015English

Reduction of the Bull: Cow Ratio in the Brazilian Pantanal

Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Animal ScienceZoologyAgronomyCrop Science
2002English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy