Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals

Yale Law Journal - United States
doi 10.2307/797418
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date

May 1, 1998

Authors
Frank B. CrossEmerson H. Tiller
Publisher

JSTOR


Related search

Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation

Virginia Law Review
Law
2004English

An Intent-Based Approach to the Acceptance of Benefits Doctrine in the Federal Courts

Michigan Law Review
Law
1993English

The Doctrine of Judicial Review, Its Legal and Historical Basis and Other Essays

California Law Review
Law
1915English

Earliest Cases of Judicial Review of State Legislation by Federal Courts

Yale Law Journal
Law
1922English

Moving Toward Law: Refocusing the Federal Courts’ Plain Error Doctrine in Criminal Cases

SSRN Electronic Journal
2011English

Abstention by Federal Courts in Suits Challenging State Administrative Decisions: The Scope of the Burford Doctrine

University of Chicago Law Review
Law
1979English

Writs of Error and Appeals From the New Territorial Courts

Yale Law Journal
Law
1907English

Federal Corporate Law, Federalism, and the Federal Courts

Law and Contemporary Problems
Law
1977English

Detention, the War on Terror, and the Federal Courts

SSRN Electronic Journal
2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy