Mixed Features of Depression: Why DSM-5 Is Wrong (And So Was DSM-IV)

British Journal of Psychiatry - United Kingdom
doi 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.124404
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Related search

DSM-IV Depression With Atypical Features: Is It Valid?

Neuropsychopharmacology
PsychiatryMental HealthPharmacology
2009English

Mixed Anxiety Depression Should Not Be Included in DSM-5

Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
PsychiatryMental Health
2012English

DSM-5

Enzyklopädie der Schlafmedizin
2020English

DSM I, Ii, Iii, Iv, 5 (1952 - 2013)

Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral
2015English

The Co-Occurrence of DSM-IV Alcohol Abusein DSM-IV Alcohol Dependence

Archives of General Psychiatry
2004English

DSM (5): Natuurlijk?

De Uil van Minerva
2019English

A Comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Panel Members' Financial Associations With Industry: A Pernicious Problem Persists

PLoS Medicine
BiochemistryBiotechnologyMolecular BiologyCell BiologyMedicine
2012English

DSM-5 Criteria and Depression Severity: Implications for Clinical Practice

Frontiers in Psychiatry
PsychiatryMental Health
2018English

The DSM-IV Definition of Severity of Major Depression: Inter-Relationship and Validity

Psychological Medicine
PsychiatryMental HealthApplied Psychology
2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy