Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 2: Hamming Loss, Precision, Accuracy, Recall and F1-Score for BoW and BoC Varying the Length of the Training Sequence in Multi-Labelled OHSUMED Corpus.

doi 10.7717/peerj.1279/table-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table 3: F1-Score for BoW and BoC Varying the Length of the Training Sequence in Single-Labelled UVigoMED Corpus.

English

Precision-Recall Versus Accuracy and the Role of Large Data Sets

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2019English

Table S2: 1,000 Taxa F1-Score Wins and Ties

English

Table S4: 500 Taxa F1-Score Wins and Ties

English

Comparative Analysis of Intersection Algorithms on Queries Using Precision, Recall and F-Score

International Journal of Computer Applications
2015English

Precision and Accuracy in Determination of Pavement Skid Resistance Uniform Section Length

2018English

The Effect of Sequence Error and Partial Training Data on BLAST Accuracy

2010English

Table 5: Comparison of 1-Hamming-Loss Per Class With SVM–SVM.

English

Figure 4: Classification Results Across Tree Species, Presented in Terms of Precision (White), Recall (Gray), and F1 Scores (Black).

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy