How to Avoid Bias in Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies

Revista CEFAC
doi 10.1590/1982-021620171941117
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Related search

Quality Assessment of Observational Studies for Systematic Reviews

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2013English

A Suggestion for Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology

Epidemiology and health
Medicine
2016English

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Preclinical Studies: Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Experiments

Laboratory Animals
Animal ScienceZoologyVeterinary
2011English

Implementing Systematic Reviews of Prognosis Studies in Cochrane

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2018English

Prevalence of Survivor Bias in Observational Studies on Fresh Frozen Plasma

Anesthesiology
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2012English

How Do Authors of Systematic Reviews Deal With Research Malpractice and Misconduct in Original Studies? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Survey of Their Authors

BMJ Open
Medicine
2016English

From the Editors’ Desk: Bias in Systematic Reviews—Let the Reader Beware

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine
2017English

Bias in Published Cost Effectiveness Studies: Systematic Review

BMJ
2006English

How to Avoid Biases in Reactive Simulations

7th International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PAAMS 2009)
2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy