Corrigendum to Commercial Quality “Awards” Are Not a Strong Indicator of Quality Surgical Care [Surgery 164 (2018) 379–386]

Surgery - United States
doi 10.1016/j.surg.2019.07.001
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Surgery
Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Why Attitudes to Quality of Care Are Changing

Australian Health Review
Health Policy
2001English

Quality of Pharmaceutical Care in Surgical Patients

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Gynaecological Day Surgery and Quality of Care

Australian Health Review
Health Policy
2002English

A Comparison of Home Care Quality Indicator Rates in Two Canadian Provinces

BMC Health Services Research
Health Policy
2014English

Comparative Study on Quality Awards

SSRN Electronic Journal
2013English

State of Acidity as an Indicator of Quality Care in Obstetrics

Journal of Perinatal Medicine
GynecologyChild HealthPediatricsPerinatologyObstetrics
1983English

The Quality Awards - A Toolkit for Organizational Excellence

Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series
2019English

Corrigendum to ‘Opioid Prescribers to Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Before and After Surgery: The Majority Are Not Orthopedists’ [The Journal of Arthroplasty 33 (2018) 3118-3124]

Journal of Arthroplasty
OrthopedicsSports Medicine
2019English

Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy as a Quality Indicator of Antenatal Care in Rural Tanzania

African journal of reproductive health
GynecologyPublic HealthReproductive MedicineEnvironmentalObstetricsOccupational Health
2003English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy