Hyperbaric vs. Isobaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section: A Cochrane Systematic Review

Anaesthesia - United Kingdom
doi 10.1111/anae.14084
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Hyperbaric vs. Isobaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section

BMJ
1937English

Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section

BMJ
1937English

Evaluation of 0.5 % Hyberbaric Ropivacaine Versus 0.5 % Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Elective Surgery Under Spinal Anaesthesia - A Comparative Study

Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences
2020English

Combined Spinal-Epidural vs. Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section: Meta-Analysis and Trial-Sequential Analysis

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Spinal Anaesthesia With Lidocaine 2% for Caesarean Section

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
MedicineAnesthesiologyPain Medicine
1992English

Spinal Anaesthesia and Caesarean Section

BMJ
1948English

A Comparison of Subhypnotic Doses of Propofol and Midazolam During Spinal Anaesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section

Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
MedicineCritical CareAnesthesiologyPain MedicineIntensive Care Medicine
2016English

Association of Lipophilic Opioids and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section. Randomized Controlled Study

Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
Surgery
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy