Bipolar Argumentation Frames and Contrary to Duty Obligations, Preliminary Report

Lecture Notes in Computer Science - Germany
doi 10.1007/978-3-642-32897-8_1
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Related search

Temporal Alethic Dyadic Deontic Logic and the Contrary-To-Duty Obligation Paradox

Logic and Logical Philosophy
Philosophy
2017English

Modelling Defeasible and Prioritized Support in Bipolar Argumentation

Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Applied MathematicsArtificial Intelligence
2012English

Computing Argumentative Explanations in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2019English

Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
2018English

Postmarketing Adverse Drug Reactions: A Duty to Report?

Neurology: Clinical Practice
Neurology
2014English

Meta-Argumentation, an Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory

Informal Logic
Philosophy
2014English

Empirical Evaluation of Abstract Argumentation: Supporting the Need for Bipolar and Probabilistic Approaches

International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Applied MathematicsTheoretical Computer ScienceArtificial IntelligenceSoftware
2018English

Introduction to Structured Argumentation

Argument and Computation
LinguisticsComputer Science ApplicationsArtificial IntelligenceLanguageComputational Mathematics
2014English

Contrary-To-Duties Constraints: From UML to Relational Model

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy