A Comparison of Forgetting Rates in Frequency Discrimination and Recognition

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
doi 10.3758/bf03333860
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Figure 4: Comparison of Species Discrimination Rates.

English

Speech Recognition and Frequency Discrimination With the Ineraid and CIS Cochlear Prostheses

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1993English

Retrieval-Induced Forgetting Occurs in Tests of Item Recognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
DevelopmentalArtsEducational PsychologyCognitive PsychologyHumanitiesExperimental
2004English

Frequency Discrimination as a Function of Frequency of Repetition and Trials.

Journal of Experimental Psychology
1971English

Impact of Different Stimulation Rates on Speech Understanding and Frequency Discrimination Using the ACE Strategy

2018English

Frequency Discrimination in Noise

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1969English

Frequency Discrimination in Noise

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1966English

A Clarification of Frequency Effects in Children’s Discrimination Learning

Memory and Cognition
ArtsNeuropsychologyCognitive PsychologyHumanitiesPhysiological PsychologyMedicineExperimental
1975English

Frequency Discrimination in Forward and Backward Masking

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1992English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy