Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 4: Consistency Index (CI), Retention Index (RI) and ‘Tree-Lengths’ of the Four Phylogenetic Trees Corresponding to the Four Data Treatments.
doi 10.7717/peerj.5901/table-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 29: Strict Consensus Tree of 120 Most Parsimonious Trees of 1,269 Steps, a Consistency Index of 0.340 and a Retention Index of 0.630.
Figure 54: Strict Consensus Tree of 85 Most Parsimonious Trees (MPTs) of Length 1,264, a Retention Index of 0.636 and a Consistency Index of 0.346.
The Harmonic Index of Two-Trees and Quasi-Tree Graphs
Journal of Mathematical Inequalities
Analysis
Table 10: Stratigraphic Consistency Metrics for Each of the Four Tree Topologies, Compared With Those of Three Previous Phylogenetic Analyses of Ingroup Phytosaur Relationships.
Integer Index in Trees of Diameter 4
Filomat
Mathematics
The Forgotten Topological Index of Four Operations on Some Special Graphs
Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences and Applications
Table 8: Mean Bremer Supports Calculated in Five Tree-Regions Within Each of the Four Data Conditions.
Figure 8: Strict Consensus Tree Constructed With the Four Trees Presented in Figs. 4–7 (D, DC, DM & DCM).
Figure 4: Phylogenetic Tree of the GSTs.
