Off-Pump Bilateral Versus Single Skeletonized Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting in High-Risk Patients

Circulation - United States
doi 10.1161/circulationaha.110.010892
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Related search

Bilateral Versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts

New England Journal of Medicine
Medicine
2017English

Right for the Wrong Reasons: Implications of Data Insufficiency in Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Analysis

Journal of the American Heart Association
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2018English

In-Hospital Outcomes of Pedicled Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Use in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Single-Surgeon, Single-Center Experience

Heart Surgery Forum
SurgeryCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2013English

Cognitive Outcomes in Elderly High-Risk Patients After Off-Pump Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Trial

Circulation
Cardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
2006English

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using in Situ Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries

Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
2005English

Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Sweden From 1997–2008

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

A Case of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Single Coronary Artery

Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
2019English

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Obesity: Combined Anesthesia Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia

Archiv Euromedica
2020English

Reinventing the Wheel: Off- Versus On- Pump Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Respiratory MedicinePulmonaryCardiovascular MedicineSurgeryCardiology
2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy