Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 2: Heatmaps Showing the Number of Homoeologs Predicted With OMA Between Each of the Chromosomes in the Two Subgenomes in (A) GOSHI, (B) BRANA, and (C–E) WHEAT.
doi 10.7717/peerj.6231/fig-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 9: Comparison of New and Old Confidence for GOSHI (A), BRANA (B), and WHEAT (C).
Figure 3: Venn Diagrams Showing the Number of MOTUs Detected in Each Size Fraction.
Figure 2: All-In Model Showing the Agreement Between Predicted Bitterness Index and the Empirical Value With All Values in RQI for Both the Training (A) and the Test Set (B).
Figure 2: Partition Tree of Fatty Acids (A) and Volatile Compounds (B) of Organic Pork Based on Genetic Type, Showing the Two Splits and the Proportion of Observations in Each Split.
Figure 2: Comparison of Partial Sequences of the Locus Ut789 Showing Two Distinct Alleles for Each of the Three Sequenced Isolates.
Figure 3: The Heatmaps of DEGs Between OSCC and Normal Tissues.
Pairing and Exchanging Between Daypyrum Villosum Chromosomes 6V#2 and 6V#4 in the Hybrids of Two Different Wheat Alien Substitution Lines
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Organic Chemistry
Molecular Biology
Theoretical Chemistry
Inorganic Chemistry
Computer Science Applications
Spectroscopy
Medicine
Catalysis
Physical
Figure 2: The Area Percentage of Each ES Indicator in Each Priority.
Figure 1: Differential Expression Genes Between the Two Groups of Samples in Each Dataset.
