C-Mac Videolaryngoscope Compared With Direct Laryngoscopy for Rapid Sequence Intubation in an Emergency Department

European Journal of Anaesthesiology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1097/eja.0000000000000525
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Related search

Comparing Emergency Intubation With Direct and Video Laryngoscopy

Academic Emergency Medicine
MedicineEmergency Medicine
2016English

Laryngoscopic Views During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Emergency Medicine
2004English

A Before-And-After Observational Study of a Protocol for Use of the C-Mac Videolaryngoscope With a Frova Introducer in Pre-Hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Use of Lidocaine and Fentanyl Premedication for Neuroprotective Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Emergency Medicine
2006English

The Use of the C-Mac Videolaryngoscope for Awake Intubation in Patients With a Predicted Extremely Difficult Airway: Case Series

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
2018English

Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for First-Attempt Tracheal Intubation in the General Ward

Annals of Intensive Care
Critical CareIntensive Care Medicine
2018English

Rapid Sequence Intubation

English

A Comparison of McGrath MAC® and Standard Direct Laryngoscopy in Simulated Immobilized Cervical Spine Pediatric Intubation: A Manikin Study

European Journal of Pediatrics
Child HealthPediatricsPerinatology
2017English

Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Intubation: Can Meta-Analysis Provide an Exact Solution?

Academic Emergency Medicine
MedicineEmergency Medicine
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy