Letter Re: Stratification of Meta-Analyses Based on Risk of Bias Is Appropriate and Does Not Induce Selection Bias

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.003
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Epidemiology
Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Correction: Popular Interest in Vertebrates Does Not Reflect Extinction Risk and Is Associated With Bias in Conservation Investment

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2019English

At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives

Perspectives on Psychological Science
Psychology
2018English

Outcome Reporting Bias: A Pervasive Problem in Published Meta-Analyses

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Nephrology
2017English

Letter Re: Sub-Groups by Quality Is Not Recommended in Meta-Analysis

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2019English

Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research

Medical Care
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2016English

On Feature Selection, Bias-Variance, and Bagging

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2009English

Response to “Selection Bias”

CMAJ
Medicine
2017English

Figure 2: (A) Risk of Bias Graph (B) Risk of Bias Summary.

English

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Preclinical Studies: Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Experiments

Laboratory Animals
Animal ScienceZoologyVeterinary
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy