El Gawhary, Van Mechelen, and Urbach Reply:

Physical Review Letters - United States
doi 10.1103/physrevlett.122.089302
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Physical Society (APS)

Related search

Dr Van Dongen-Boomsma and Colleagues Reply

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2014English

Reply to JJ Van Middendorp, AJF Hosman and H Van De Meent's Letter

Spinal Cord
MedicineNeurologyRehabilitation
2008English

Reply to Comments by R. Van Dooren

Physics of Fluids
Engineering
1979English

Reply to Van Hoorn: Converging Lines of Evidence

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2012English

Reply to Van Oven: Suggestions and Caveats for Naming mtDNA Haplogroup

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2010English

Cavafy, Vos, Dangor: A Belated Reply to Phil Van Schalkwyk

Literator
LinguisticsLiteratureLiterary TheoryLanguage
2019English

Sensory Piety as Social Intervention in a Mechelen Besloten Hofje

Journal of Historians of Netherlandish Art
2017English

Confirming the Appearance of Excess Success: Reply to Van Boxtel and Koch (2016)

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
DevelopmentalArtsEducational PsychologyCognitive PsychologyHumanitiesExperimental
2016English

Don’t Forget About the ‘R’ in cmRCT; Reply to Groenwold and Van Smeden

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy