Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 4: Graphs (A–R) Show the Performance of the Model, Measured by Precision-Recall and MAP Scores.
doi 10.7717/peerj.3742/fig-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Classification Results Across Tree Species, Presented in Terms of Precision (White), Recall (Gray), and F1 Scores (Black).
Figure 4: Establishment of Immune Risk Scores Model.
Figure 6: Weighted Precision–recall Curves of the CAFA2 HPO Prediction Challenge.
Figure 4: Correlations Between the Different Traits of R. Alpina Measured at Five Different Elevations.
Investigating the Relationship Between Language Model Perplexity and IR Precision-Recall Measures
Figure 2: Estimating MSD-model Parameters by Fitting the MSD-model to Measured Trunk Accelerometry and Measured GRF.
Figure 4: The Correlation Between the Cognitive Scores and the Functional Index, mReHo.
Figure 4: The Relationship Between Scores on the Avatar Task and the CBAS Subscales.
Figure 4: The Location and Improvement Scores of Barriers in Different Linkage Categories.
