Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 4: Boxplots PER Scores for Each Foraging Category in Colony 6 (A) and Colony 8 (B).
doi 10.7717/peerj.2599/fig-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Link Between Damage Scores of All Organs in Individual Fish for Each Treatment.
Figure 12: F1 Scores (Per-Class) for Training Data (A) and Testing Data (B—provided by Competition).
Figure 4: Mean RMDQ Change Scores at Each Time Point, by Group.
The Regulation of Ant Colony Foraging Activity Without Spatial Information
PLoS Computational Biology
Molecular Neuroscience
Evolution
Ecology
Genetics
Behavior
Molecular Biology
Systematics
Simulation
Cellular
Computational Theory
Mathematics
Modeling
Does Foraging Efficiency Vary With Colony Size in the Fairy martinPetrochelidon Ariel?
Journal of Avian Biology
Evolution
Ecology
Systematics
Animal Science
Behavior
Zoology
Figure 6: Predicted Binding Modes of (A) Compound 6 and (B) Compound 8 to pVHL.
Figure 8: ROC Curves for 3D Scores, R.E.N.A.L. Scores, PADUA Scores and CI Scores Predicting WIT > 30 Min.
Table S1: General Information About Each Termite Colony/Subcolony Group and Disturbance Test
Medical Literature for Kenya Colony
BMJ
